|
SCALE RC MODELER ( MARCH/
APRIL 1999 ) VOL. 26
|
|
SCALE RC MODELER [PAGE 1]
SCALE RC MODELER [PAGE 2]
|
|

The Nieuport seen inverted on the author's work bench as he
prepared to install the lower wings. Note the muffler which required
making a notch in the firewall and the lower fuselage stubs on which
the lower wings are attached.
|
|
Also, the aileron push rods had
to be slightly bent to make a proper exit through the holes in the
hatch. Since the curved fuselage hatch that covers the servo trays was
not fitted with a hold-down means, I ran a long rubber band over the
hatch and connected it to two carburetor inlet duct tubes that project
from each side of the fuselage. Given more time, I could have devised
an interior means of clamping the access hatch to the fuselage. This
would avoid using unsightly rubber bands that otherwise mar the
Nieuport's well-scaled lines.
THE LANDING GEAR & TAIL SKID
The wheel installation could not be
simpler. Bungee-type rubber bands are carefully laced around small
spurs at the bottom of the landing gear fork and over the top of the
one piece metal axle.
|

Ready for the Nieuport's takeoff, Rich and pilot Chris Spangenberg
make a final runway check of the engine before letting her roll. The
large rudder effectively allowed the model to track the runway
centerline as soon as power was applied.
|
|
All shock absorption is
contained within a 1/2" slot in the landing gear. This offers
limited spring value on hard landings but it does follow the ultra
simple mechanism employed on the prototype. Likewise, the tail skid is
fitted with a rubber band to provide proper spring action on landing.
Wire cross-braces provide landing gear strengthening and were easily
installed per Manual directions. Up to this point I had expended about
18 hours in readying the Nieuport for flight.
|
THE FINAL STEP: MATING THE WINGS TO THE
FUSELAGE
Fitting the upper wing to the cabane
struts proved to be the most challenging aspect of the entire project.
Though 3 Sea Bee Models pre-assembles every model before shipment to a
customer, I could not get the wings and cabane to properly align. The
upper wing is bolted to the cabane with four 6-32 Allen bolts. Three
fit perfectly, but the fourth persisted in being 1/4N off
longitudinally. Fearing I was doing something wrong, I called Bob
Brook at 3 Sea Bees Models to see if I could bend the offending strut.
Bob said he could not imagine what the problem was, but that he would
get back to me within an hour. In less than an hour I received a call
from designer Goran Kalderen in the Philippines. He approved bending
the strut, but warned to make sure the top wing was tangent to the
fuselage center line. How right Goran was!
|
|

A 3/4-aft view of the 3 Sea Bees' Nieuport 17 shows the precise
fidelitY built into at the factory. The only items missing are either
a Lewis or Vickers machine gun and a scale pilot.
|
After bending the strut
the wing attached perfectly, however it was 7/8H out of whack in
measuring the tail post to the wing tips. Then the fun began! In
desperation I grabbed the wing and fuselage and torqued them to the
right until the differential was reduced to about l/4H. This was
acceptable. If nothing else this little maneuver proved how stoutly
this hummer is designed and built. Next carne connecting and adjusting
the aileron horns to the torque rods. This step went smooth as butter
with two wheel collars providing a simple method to make the final all
important aileron adjustments.
With the top wing in place and the model on its
gear, it looked ready to leap into the sky and take on the dreaded
Hun. But my flush of victory was short-lived. Next came attachment of
the lower wings!
The bottom wings have an attachment rod that
is pushed into holes with soft aluminum tabs on the bottom of the
fuselage to establish proper incidence. In my opinion a minor redesign
of this fitting would ensure more positive alignment since the soft
aluminum bends easily. ( For the record, the lower wings of the real
Nieuports were ground-adjustable to achieve desired changes in
performance.) The interplane "Vee" struts were then bolted
in place, however it was now impossible to make the flying and landing
wires fit! Also, the upper wing drooped and the lower wings did not
have the required dihedral.
After scratching my head a while I turned the
airplane upside down on my work bench and blocked the upper wing
perfectly straight. This worked! The lower wings, wires and all were
now a cinch to install.
But my rigging problems were not
completely resolved. The model looked great, however I now noticed
there was too much washout in one lower wing and an insufficient
amount in the other. To correct this required loosening the interplane
struts, adjusting the landing and flying wires and adding a
smal13/l6Hbalsa wedge between the bottom of the "Vee" strut
and the top of lower wing. A little twisting of the top wing then
brought everything in perfect alignment. In fairness to 3 Sea Bees
Models, it should be mentioned that properly rigging any biplane is
always the most important aspect of obtaining top flying performance.
The task is vastly simplified with "N" interplane struts as
opposed to the Nieuport's "Vee" strut since the lower wing
has only one attachment point.
Solving the riddle of the wings had
added another 12 hours to the assembly time, a total now of 30 hours
since I'd opened the box. Placing so much emphasis on wing alignment
and incidence might appear like too much overkill, but it was to
payoff in spades the next day when the Nieuport took wing.
THE LONG AWAITED TEST FLIGHT
Chris Spangenberg wanted to fly the
Nieuport as much as I did. Afterall, it WAS his engine up front. A
coin toss settled the matter -Chris would be on the sticks for the
first test hop at our club's model flying field, which included a
preflight photo shoot. SRC editor Ed Schnepf showed up to take the
photos while a bunch of club members looked on approvingly as I made
final adjustments to the engine, controls and such.
The morning air was cool and crisp as Chris
revved the Nieuport for a highspeed taxi test. With only a tail skid,
all directional control on takeoff relies on the rudder. This made
Chris most anxious about torque effect on the initial application of
power. Checking to see how the model would turn at speed, we were
surprised to see one tire separate from the wheel when side loading
was applied. Back we went to the pit for a quick repair. Tension
mounted. The wind began to rise. Undaunted, Chris finally pronounced
it was time to fly. It was now or never.
At half-throttle the dandy little fighter broke
ground after a straight and true takeoff roll of 50 feet. Chris beamed
as the Nieuport snappily responded to every command.
|
|

|

|
|
The dandy
little Nieuport, one of the most popular of World War I era
fighters, roars off into the blue on its test hop. Only half
power was needed to get airborne.
|
|
|
Making a series of fly-bys for
the cameras he honked the model up a hundred feet into the sky and
tried a few stalls. Recovering smoothly with only a tad of power,
Chris then zoomed her high in a perfect loop, did a split'S' and
Immelman turn and let her dive until we could hear the wind whistling
in the Nieuport's wires. Banking around for a landing Chris eased off
the power, let the nose raise slightly to dissipate airspeed, and
three-pointed her right in front of the cameras. A hearty round of
applause greeted the smooth rollout. Everyone agreed 3 Sea Bees
Models' Nieuport 17 was every bit the classic of her progenitor -a
sure-fire performer; a welcomed new entry to the scale ARF arena.
CONCLUSION & PERSONAL
RECOMMENDATIONS
Make no mistake -ARFs are here to stay. After
assembling the Nieuport I can fully appreciate the appeal of
prefabricated models. They save considerable time and offer advanced
design advantages that make them ideal for fun or competition flying.
Having had no previous experience in ARF assembly I am amazed that it
required only a little over 30 hours to get 3 Sea Bees Nieuport into
the air. Also most commendable was 3 Sea Bees team responsiveness to
my questions. They are to be congratulated for their product support.
|
|

With SRC editor/publisher Ed Schnepf looking on, Rich Tejada adds
four ounces of lead to the inside of the cowling to establish the
model's proper CG.
|
By way of personal
assessment I would like to offer a few suggestions to make assembly,
rigging and flying even more enjoyable:
1.) Owing to the rigging problems encountered in most biplanes this
model is best suited for experienced modelers.
2.) The excellent final finish and appearance is superior to
that which the average modeler can achieve.
3.) The rigging hardware furnished with this kit could be more in
scale.
4.) A more positive method of holding the incidence of the lower wing
should be devised.
5.) The Vee strut connections might be redesigned for easier
adjustment.
6.) Attaching the top wing would be simpler if bolts were to extend
down from the top wing and be held with a lock nut.
|
7.) Though the Nieuport is no trainfr, flying this
model should be well within the capability of the average RICer.
8.) The Assembly Manual should be more fully illustrated with
difficult to explain assembly sequences.
9.) Adding minor details such as a Vickers or Lewis machine gun will
further enhance the attractiveness of the finely scaled model. Lending
itself well to super- detailing, the builder may wish to add a battery
of eight balloon-bl!sting Le Prieur incendiary rockets to the "Vee"
struts. Squadron Signal Publications #167 on the Nieuport 17 offers a
host of excellent super-detailing hints and markings.
10.) Care taken in assembly pays off handsomely when it comes time to
fly this highly recommended ARF kit.
|
|

[ NIEUPORT 17-C1 K & W Datasheet ]
|
|
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
|
|
SCALE RC MODELER [PAGE 1]
SCALE RC MODELER [PAGE 2]
|
|
SCALE RC MODELER ( MARCH/
APRIL 1999 ) VOL. 26
|